ch.ch
Gerichte Zürich
Bezirksgericht Winterthur
Scheidung
Scheidungskonvention
Formular Ehe und Familie: Scheidungsbegehren
Multiprotocol Label Switching (de)
Multiprotocol Label Switching (en)
MPLS VPN (en)
Multiprotocol BGP (en)
Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) (en)
Resource Reservation Protocol (RSVP)
Resource Reservation Protocol – Traffic Engineering (RSVP-TE)
Label Distribution Protocol (LDP)
List of router firmware projects
OpenWrt (unmaintained)
Freifunk (fork of OpenWrt)
LEDE Project (fork of OpenWrt)
DD-WRT
LEDE call for vote on remerge proposal V3, Ende Juni 2017 wurde das positive Ergebnis der Abstimmung über die Reintegration bekanntgegeben.
Freifunk-Firmware
Freifunk 3Ländereck
Router-Empfehlung für OpenWrt & DD-WRT | 2014
OpenWrt: Kompatible Router in der Übersicht
WLAN-Roaming (ESSID / IEEE 802.11f) (Mehrere WLAN Access Points, gleiche SSID)
WLAN mit mehreren Basisstationen
Typische Fehler bei der Konfiguration von WLANs
Galaxy Tab pro (12.2, Wi-Fi) (SM-T9000ZWADBT)
Vergleich SAMSUNG Galaxy Note Pro WiFi SM-P900 oder SAMSUNG Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 SM-T900 WiFi
Odin (firmware flashing software)
LineageOS
LineageOS Android Distribution
LineageOS Wiki – Google apps
Bootloader SM-T900 (Lollipop)
TWRP for Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 Wi-Fi
versus.com: Compare
Samsung Galaxy Note Pro vs. Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2, 10.1 and 8.4
Es werden die Smartphones und Tablets Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 2014 Edition, Apple iPad Air, Microsoft Surface Pro, Microsoft Surface Pro 2 und Samsung Galaxy Tab 3 10.1 verglichen.
Vergleichstest: Top 10 Tablets
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 vs. iPad mini with Retina Display
Samsung Galaxy Tab S (10.5) vs Samsung Galaxy TabPro 10.1: What’s the difference?
Super AMOLED Vs Retina Vs OLED Vs LCD Vs IPS: What’s the Difference?
XDA Forums
Android USB Driver for Windows
TWRP for Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 12.2 Wi-Fi
Download Odin Tool (All Versions) for Samsung Galaxy Devices
Download USB Drivers for Android Devices from Major OEMs
Giga.de – Odin: Download und Nutzung des Flash-Tools für Android (Video), 19.09.2016
[Q] Upgrade/Downgrade/headaches
How to do downgrade my Android Tablet is Samsung Galaxy Note Pro 12.2?
Update Samsung Galaxy Tab PRO 12.2 (WiFi) (SM-T900) T900UESBPL1 Lollipop
Firmware SM-T900 / T900UESBPL1
[ROM][6.0.x|SM-T900| Unofficial LineageOS 13.0 (v2awifi)
[ROM][7.1.x|SM-T900| Unofficial LineageOS 14.1 (v2awifi)
Turn on your device using the proper key combo to get into download mode and attach the device to your computer via a USB cable.
Power off your Tab Pro. Press
Volume Down,HomeandPower buttonsaltogether until you see the warning screen. Press thePower buttonagain to boot into Download Mode.
Switzerland (CH)
5 Features In Java 8 That WILL Change How You Code
Java 8 Stream Tutorial
Processing Data with Java SE 8 Streams, Part 1
How to Read a Large CSV File With Java 8 and Stream API
| program | obsoleted by |
|---|---|
| arp | ip neigh |
| ifconfig | ip addr |
| ipmaddr | ip maddr |
| iptunnel | ip tunnel |
| route | ip route |
| nameif | ifrename |
| mii-tool | ethtool |
iproute2
IPROUTE2 Utility Suite Howto
VLAN for iproute2
ip [ OPTIONS ] OBJECT [ COMMAND [ ARGUMENTS ]] link - physical or logical network device. address - protocol (IPv4 or IPv6) address on a device. neighbour - ARP or NDISC cache entry. route - routing table entry. rule - rule in routing policy database. maddress - multicast address. mroute - multicast routing cache entry. tunnel - tunnel over IP.
# Add IPv4 address $ ip addr add 10.41.0.2/8 dev eth0 # Bring interface up $ ip link set eth0 up # Add VLAN virtual interface $ ip link add link eth0 name eth0.100 type vlan id 100 # Add IPv4 address to VLAN virtual interface and bring it up $ ip addr add 192.168.100.1/24 brd 192.168.100.255 dev eth0.100 $ ip link set dev eth0.100 up
arp, ifconfig, ipmaddr, iptunnel, route, nameif, mii-tool
net-tools (obsolete)
OSADL
Petr N. Devyanin, Alexey V. Khoroshilov, Victor V. Kuliamin, Alexander K. Petrenko, Ilya V. Shchepetkov
Institute for System Programming (ISP) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS)
Formal Verification of OS Security Model with Alloy and Event-B
LinkedIn: Alexey Khoroshilov
dblp: computer science bibliography
UniTESK at Embedded World 2014
LinuxTesting Slides of our talks at LinuxCon Europe 2011
VK: Dmitri Kasakow
Staatliche Technische Universität Moskau (MSTU)
BlogSpot: dimula73
launchpad: dimula73
github: dimula73
Kickstarker: Krita
RFC 1034 – Domain names – concepts and facilities, November 1987
RFC 1035 – Domain names – implementation and specification, November 1987
RFC 1886 – DNS Extensions to support IP version 6, December 1995
RFC 2136 – Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System (DNS UPDATE), April 1997
RFC 2308 – Negative Caching of DNS Queries (DNS NCACHE), March 1998
RFC 2535 – Domain Name System Security Extensions, March 1999
RFC DRAFT – A New Scheme for the Compression of Domain Names, June 1999 (not used?)
RFC 2874 – DNS Extensions to Support IPv6 Address Aggregation and Renumbering, July 2000
RFC 3225 – Indicating Resolver Support of DNSSEC, December 2001
RFC 3775 – Legacy Resolver Compatibility for Delegation Signer (DS), May 2004
RFC 4033 – DNS Security Introduction and Requirements, March 2005
RFC 4034 – Resource Records for the DNS Security Extensions, March 2005
RFC 4035 – Protocol Modifications for the DNS Security Extensions, March 2005
RFC 5155 – DNS Security (DNSSEC) Hashed Authenticated Denial of Existence, March 2008
RFC 6840 – Clarifications and Implementation Notes for DNS Security (DNSSEC), February 2013
RFC 6891 – Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS(0)), April 2013 (OPT RR)
RFC 6895 – Domain Name System (DNS) IANA Considerations, April 2013
DNS Message Header and Question Section Format
O’Reilly DNS & BIND: C Programming with the Resolver Library Routines
| 64 32 16| 8 4 2 1| 64 32 16| 8 4 2 1| | 8 4 2 1| 8 4 2 1| 8 4 2 1| 8 4 2 1| +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ | 1 1 | OFFSET | +--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+ The first two bits are ones. This allows a pointer to be distinguished from a label, since the label must begin with two zero bits because labels are restricted to 63 octets or less.
00 0D B9 35 88 B4 00 1B 21 5C 22 01 08 00 45 00 ...5....!\"...E.
00 77 5D B5 00 00 3B 11 AC CA A0 55 C0 64 0A 29 .w]...;....U.d.)
0A 14 00 35 83 7B 00 63 CE A1 A2 20 81 80 00 01 ...5.{.c... .�..
00 04 00 00 00 00 06 67 6F 6F 67 6C 65 02 63 68 .......google.ch
00 00 01 00 01 C0 0C 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 CE 00 ................
04 AD C2 74 2F C0 0C 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 CE 00 ...t/...........
04 AD C2 74 37 C0 0C 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 CE 00 ...t7...........
04 AD C2 74 38 C0 0C 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 CE 00 ...t8...........
04 AD C2 74 3F ...t?
00 0D B9 35 88 B4 00 1B 21 5C 22 01 08 00 ...5....!\"...
Ethernet |-Destination MAC 00:0d:b9:35:88:b4 |-Source MAC 00:1b:21:5c:22:01 |-Type IPv4 (0x0800)
45 00 E.
00 77 5D B5 00 00 3B 11 AC CA A0 55 C0 64 0A 29 .w]...;....U.d.)
0A 14
IPv4 Header
|-IP Version 4
|-IP Header Length 5 dwords or 20 bytes
|-Differentiated Service 0x00
|-IP Total Length 119 bytes
|-Identification 0x5db5 (23989)
|-Flags 0x0000 (0)
|-Don't Fragment Field no set
|-More Fragment Field no set
|-Fragment Offset 0x0000 (0)
|-TTL 59
|-Protocol UDP (17)
|-Checksum 0xacca (44234)
|-Source IP 160.85.192.100 (0x64c055a0)
|-Destination IP 10.41.10.20 (0x140a290a)
. 00 35 83 7B 00 63 CE A1 .5.{.c..
UDPv4 Header |-Source Port DNS (53) |-Destination Port unknow (33659) |-UDP Length 99 Bytes |-UDP Checksum 0xcea1 (52897)
A2 20 81 80 00 01 . .�..
00 04 00 00 00 00 ......
DNS Header
|-Identifier 0xa220 (41504)
|-Flags 0x8180 (33152)
|-Query / Response (qr) Response
|-Operation Code (opcode) Query (0x0000)
|-Authoritative Answer (aa) not set
|-Truncation (tc) not set
|-Recursion Desired (rd) set
|-Recursion Available (ra) set
|-Authentic Data (ad) not set
|-Checking Disabled (cd) not set
|-Response Code (rcode) No Error (0)
|-Questions 1 (0x0001)
|-Answer RRs 4 (0x0004)
|-Authority RRs 0 (0x0000)
|-Additional RRs 0 (0x0000)
QNAME (n labels), QTYPE, QCLASS
len value len value
len = zero 06 67 6F 6F 67 6C 65 02 63 68 .google.ch
00 00 01 00 01
qtype qclass
NAME (n labels), TYPE, CLASS, TTL, RDLENGTH, RDATA
link (16-bit)
value C0 0C 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 CE 00 ...........
04 AD C2 74 2F type class ttl len ...t/
C0 0C 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 CE 00 ...........
04 AD C2 74 37 ...t7
C0 0C 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 CE 00 ...........
04 AD C2 74 38 ...t8
C0 0C 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 CE 00 ...........
04 AD C2 74 3F ...t?
cb f3 81 80 00 01 00 02 00 00 00 00 07 61 6e 64
72 6f 69 64 0a 77 65 61 74 68 65 72 70 72 6f 0a
6d 65 74 65 6f 67 72 6f 75 70 02 64 65 00 00 01
00 01 c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 00 af 00 1d 0c 6c
62 77 65 61 74 68 65 72 70 72 6f 0a 6d 65 74 65
6f 67 72 6f 75 70 03 63 6f 6d 00 c0 3e 00 01 00
01 00 00 02 53 00 04 c2 35 00 aa
DNS Header:
cb f3 81 80 00 01 00 02 00 00 00 00
Query:
07 61 6e 64
72 6f 69 64 0a 77 65 61 74 68 65 72 70 72 6f 0a
6d 65 74 65 6f 67 72 6f 75 70 02 64 65 00 00 01
00 01
Answer:
c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 00 af 00 1d 0c 6c
62 77 65 61 74 68 65 72 70 72 6f 0a 6d 65 74 65
6f 67 72 6f 75 70 03 63 6f 6d 00
c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 00 af 00 1d 0c 6c ………….l
62 77 65 61 74 68 65 72 70 72 6f 0a 6d 65 74 65 bweatherpro.mete
6f 67 72 6f 75 70 03 63 6f 6d 00 c0 3e 00 01 00 ogroup.com..>…
01 00 00 02 53 00 04 c2 35 00 aa ….S…5..
c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 00 af 00 1d 0c 6c ………….l
62 77 65 61 74 68 65 72 70 72 6f 0a 6d 65 74 65 bweatherpro.mete
6f 67 72 6f 75 70 03 63 6f 6d 00 c0 3e 00 01 00 ogroup.com..>…
01 00 00 02 53 00 04 c2 35 00 aa ….S…5..
cb f3 81 80 00 01 00 02 00 00 00 00 07 61 6e 64 ………….and
72 6f 69 64 0a 77 65 61 74 68 65 72 70 72 6f 0a roid.weatherpro.
6d 65 74 65 6f 67 72 6f 75 70 02 64 65 00 00 01 meteogroup.de…
00 01 c0 0c 00 05 00 01 00 00 00 af 00 1d 0c 6c ……………l
62 77 65 61 74 68 65 72 70 72 6f 0a 6d 65 74 65 bweatherpro.mete
6f 67 72 6f 75 70 03 63 6f 6d 00 c0 3e 00 01 00 ogroup.com..>…
01 00 00 02 53 00 04 c2 35 00 aa ….S…5..
can a dns packet have (question section > 1)
Some thoughts on QDCOUNT
Requesting A and AAAA records in single DNS query
4.1.1. Header section format
The header contains the following fields:
1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| ID |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|QR| Opcode |AA|TC|RD|RA| Z | RCODE |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| QDCOUNT |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| ANCOUNT |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| NSCOUNT |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| ARCOUNT |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
3.2.2. The CD Bit The CD bit exists in order to allow a security-aware resolver to disable signature validation in a security-aware name server's processing of a particular query 3.2.3. The AD Bit The name server side of a security-aware recursive name server MUST NOT set the AD bit in a response unless the name server considers all RRsets in the Answer and Authority sections of the response to be authentic. The name server side SHOULD set the AD bit if and only if the resolver side considers all RRsets in the Answer section and any relevant negative response RRs in the Authority section to be authentic.
2. DNS Query/Response Headers
The header for DNS queries and responses contains field/bits in the
following diagram taken from [RFC2136]:
1 1 1 1 1 1
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| ID |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
|QR| OpCode |AA|TC|RD|RA| Z|AD|CD| RCODE |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| QDCOUNT/ZOCOUNT |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| ANCOUNT/PRCOUNT |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| NSCOUNT/UPCOUNT |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+
| ARCOUNT |
+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+--+